This essay is in response to three recent submissions to the SMDP by airport proponents. One is the May 10-11 column by Joe Bates in which he addresses my
SMO - Voters will have a chance to decide whether or not to take more direct control over the future of the Santa Monica Airport.
A ballot initiative, which was financially
CITY HALL — City Council is getting closer to a final ballot measure designed to compete with one put forth by advocates of the Santa Monica Airport.
At Tuesday's
CITY HALL — City Council will consider putting forward a ballot measure that would be less restrictive of council's power to control the airport than one previously proposed by
CITY HALL — No one had anything nice to say about a potential City Council-backed ballot measure that would hand council's power to the voters on some issues
Editor:
The council is considering the same laws for e-cigs that are already on the books for tobacco smoking. What a laugh! Are they really? Since they do not
SMO - The pro-airport group that filed 15,700 petition signatures last week supporting a ballot initiative to pull the future of Santa Monica Airport from City Council's
Editor:
Your paper has published many letters from Santa Monica Airport supporters.
How many of the SMO supporters actually live under the airport flight path?
We in the flight path
CITYWIDE - A national aviation association spent $56,000 in support of a ballot initiative that aims to put the future of the Santa Monica Airport in the hands of the
Editor:
In response to pilot Reynold Dacon's May 27 letter, in which he warns that closing Santa Monica Airport (SMO) would bring "low-flying, large commercial jets&
CITY HALL — Proponents of the Santa Monica Airport handed city officials 15,700 signatures Tuesday afternoon, supporting their attempt to put its future in the hands of the voters.
In
